Sheriff Bert, The Scantily Clad Caddie Cuties, And Me

There are good newspapers, and there are bad newspapers.

Then there are the newspapers that publishers give away for free because nobody will pay for them. Most people don’t read these newspapers. They use them as rags to pick up dog shit. That’s the sort of publication I worked for when I was about 25 years old. A freebie dog-shit wipe that paid accordingly.

The thing is, I loved it.

I took it seriously, too. My work was my identity then, and as a professionally trained, post-Watergate-era journalist, I believed The Fourth Estate had bestowed me with a divine mandate to investigate and expose corruption. So I tore into the local government like a pit bull on a poodle, shitting out shit about the shits who ran the place almost as fast I could write it.

I like to tell prospective employers that I successfully exposed the city’s raw underbelly because I was a razor-sharp investigative reporter. A courageous crusader cut from the same rugged cloth as investigative reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, who are my personal heroes because they broke the Watergate scandal and never had to work a full day again in their lives.  

But the plain truth is that it was easy pickings. My editors could’ve given a pen and a notepad to a brain-damaged chimpanzee and had a front-page scandal handed back to them to every week. In fact, I’m pretty sure one of my co-workers was a chimp. Dude was hairier than Robin Williams, slept on the floor of his apartment, and—I kid you not—he smelled like bananas.

Despite that, I credit my good fortune to the city and the county it sat in.

The city was primed for scandal because it just didn’t have much going for it. Its main claim to fame was that it was due north of Denver on Interstate 25, making it an easy commute for the hard-working, lower-income men and women who lived there. To be perfectly fair and balanced, the city also had close ties to legendary actress Jane Russell. You might remember Russell or her ample cleavage. The brunette bombshell visited the city in 1953 to “christen” the model ranch-style homes in its new subdivision. City officials were so proud, they named the curviest street in town after her, Russell Way.

But let’s face it, that’s not much to be proud of.  

The county, meanwhile, was mostly known for its gravel pits, seedy strip clubs, houses of ill-repute, shadowy mob bosses and Louisiana-style politics. Which is to say that from a reporter’s point of view, it was both delightfully spicy and wonderfully rotten. The sort of place that teaches newshounds how to spell “allegedly” in a hurry because lots of fun allegedly criminal stuff allegedly happened there.

One year, for example, a county prosecutor was allegedly caught red-handed consorting with a scantily clad “Caddie Cutie” on the county golf course at an annual tournament hosted by the colorful county sheriff.

By “red-handed,” I mean with his alleged penis allegedly hanging out of his unzipped pants.

By “consorting,” I mean allegedly getting a blowjob.

By “scantily clad,” I mean scantily clad, and not allegedly. I saw the photos.

By “Caddie Cutie,” I mean alleged hooker.

And by sheriff, I mean alleged Sheriff Bert “BJ” Johnson. I’m not shitting you here: His last name was Johnson and his nickname was BJ.

It defied reality, and had us hard-bitten newspaper reporters falling to our knees and thanking God for His good bounty. Or maybe it was high-fiving one another and tossing back cold beers and hot whiskey at the 24-hour bar conveniently—and perhaps deliberately—located next door, Bill’s Third Lounge: Last Stop Before Home.

I don’t rightly remember now.

I don’t recall what happened to Sheriff Bert, the prosecutor or the Caddie Cuties, either, and to be honest, I don’t much care. I think they were all acquitted of any wrongdoing in a court of law but had to resign in shame anyway. Whatever their fates, I wish them all the best.  

What I do know for sure is that I miss that job. I miss the bitter smell of stale cigarette smoke and cynicism that lingered in the disheveled and dirty newsroom.

I miss the random assortment of broken-down, second-hand desks piled high with old newspapers, legal documents, notebooks, push-button telephones and empty beer cans and donut boxes. I miss the dark, faux-wood paneling and the constant clackety-clack of computer keyboards at deadline.

I miss my fellow reporters, even the guy who smelled like bananas.

And I especially miss picking up the phone and listening to the hushed voice of a county attorney, elected official or cop giving me a reliable lead on a hot story.

The adrenaline rush that followed.

The deadline desperation.

I loved it there, even if it was a dog-shit wipe newspaper.

I'm the second investigative reporter nerd from the left.

 

Share

Does God Exist?

Does God exist?

The Greek philosopher Plato thought so.

“So what?” you exclaim. “The dude’s been dead longer than Christ. What do I care what an old guy who was named after dinnerware thought about anything?”

“Shut up, you moron,” I reply. “Plato was Greek, and the Greeks invented the gyros, one of the world’s top-five sandwiches.”

“I agree the gyros is good, but it’s no argument for God,” you say defensively. “Thinly sliced pastrami on rye with stone-ground mustard, sure. Turkey with avocado, sprouts and bacon, absolutely. But not the gyros.”

“Then unlike me, you never visited Paris in the summertime and supped on a gyros made with fresh-roasted, herb-encrusted lamb served on a fresh-baked French baguette,” I argue.

“Who the hell uses words like ‘herb-encrusted’ and ‘supped?’ ” you say mockingly.

“I do,” I reply. “I like big words. They confuse people.” And that’s when I take the opportunity presented to me by your stunned silence to brilliantly reconstruct Plato’s argument for God’s existence. Not using Greek, which is Greek to me, but using everyday language just like you’d hear in a deli. 

Pretend it’s lunchtime, and you decide to go to Mr. Gyros because you’re hungry and, as I previously mentioned, it’s lunchtime. You eat your gyros, and it’s very good. But it’s also a little disappointing because you can’t forget that perfect gyros you ate 25 years ago while you were on vacation in Paris. The one gyros that was so good, it ruined you to all other gyros.

Gyrosis?

Gyri?

Look, I don’t know what the plural of gyros is. Gyros might already be plural, for all I know. Maybe a lone gyros is a gyro, and a whole bunch of them—what you’d order if you were having a toga party and needed to feed a crowd, for example—are gyros.

Gyros certainly sounds plural, although I’ve never heard anybody order a gyro, probably because most Americans don’t give a flying fava bean about grammar when they’re hungry.

But that’s not my point. I’m not Grammar Girl, and I don’t want to be. Not openly, anyway.

My point is that Plato reasoned that if you’re disappointed with the quality of your gyros, it’s probably not because you have a crappy job and can only afford to eat at fast-food restaurants like Mr. Gyros. It’s because your soul recalls dining on the archetypical gyros—the perfect gyros that was originally created by God. (Or in my case, an Arab street vendor who set up his gyros cart within spitting distance of the Opéra de Paris.)

It’s our rational perception of these ideal forms that proves Heaven’s existence, or, conversely, proves the material world around us isn’t the real world, but only a copy of the real world inhabited by God. By the way, a similar argument for the existence of Supreme Divinity can also be made using a really good tzatziki sauce, although it’s harder to sustain because some people don’t like the condiment because it tastes like yoghurt mixed with cucumbers—which, oddly enough, it is.

Plato’s argument made him very popular with God-believers, and quite a few gyros-eaters, too. In the words of English philosopher Alfred North Whitehead (no relation), “The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato. Now pass the baklava, please.”

Plato had his critics, of course.

His mother, for example, told him to quit wasting his time smoking grape leaves and chatting it up with his buddies Aristotle and Socrates at the Academy of Athens. She begged him to get a real job, preferably in medicine or the law. American astronomer and television personality Carl Sagan also pooh-poohed the philosopher for telling astronomers not to waste their time observing the stars and planets because ideas were far more real than the natural world. “Plato expressed hostility to observation and experiment,” he wrote. “He taught contempt for the real world and disdain for the practical application of scientific knowledge. Plato’s followers succeeded in extinguishing the light of science.”

Not all scientific light, obviously, or Thomas Edison wouldn’t be so incredibly famous for inventing the light bulb and you’d be reading this column on a stone tablet instead of an iPad. Sagan tended to be a tiny wee bit hyperbolic when his livelihood was being threatened.

Personally, I’m not smart or well-educated enough to know if Plato was right or wrong about God.

But I like him anyway. Why? Because he thought Atlantis existed, and the whole concept of a mythical, scientifically advanced continent peopled by the descendants of the sea-god Poseidon is awesome in my book.

Plato wrote about Atlantis in his dialogues Timaeus and Critias, noting that the island was once located near the pillars of Heracles flanking the Strait of Gibraltar. If you’re American, you have no idea where that is, and I doubt Plato did, either. Plato was Greek, after all, and I’m pretty sure he drank a lot of Ouzo, an anise-flavored liquor that not only makes an excellent apéritif, but a passably good rocket fuel.

Despite Plato’s obvious drinking problem, a lot of people accepted his description of the mythical land of Atlantis as Gospel truth. Well, not exactly Gospel truth, because Timaeus and Critias were written about 360 years before Jesus showed up to heal the blind and hand out loaves and fishes to his followers like they grow on trees.

It seemed true enough, though, partly because Plato was very specific. He described Atlantis as a “confederation of kings” with “great and marvelous power.” He also said it was larger than ancient Libya and Turkey put together, and was on “the way to the other islands, and from these you might pass to the whole of the opposite continent.” His account included detailed descriptions of the island’s northern mountains as well as its southern plains.

Still, most people think Atlantis—like God—is a myth.

But a team of American scientists from the University of Hartford, Connecticut, recently announced that they believe a tsunami buried the fabled continent under some mud flats in southern Spain thousands of years ago. They’re using satellite imagery, deep-ground radar, digital mapping and underwater technology to locate artifacts and remnants of what they say are its buildings.

I hope they’re right.

But nobody’s going to believe it’s true until they unearth a Mr. Gyros.

Share

My Friend Rick, The Buddhist

My friend Rick is a Buddhist.

One of the things Buddhists believe is that nothing is permanent. People, for example, change out every cell their bodies once every seven years or so. So you’re a whole new person every seven years. Plus, because matter is constantly moving through space and time, permanence is an illusion. Everything’s always in a constant state of flux.

This is confusing to me because Rick pretty much always seems like Rick, not new Rick, or Ricky Bobby, or Ricky Ricardo, or Rick Slick, or whoever he seems to think he is at any given moment. That’s why I like to call Rick every once in a while and say, “Is this Rick?”

“Yes,” he says.

“How do you know you are?” I ask.

“I just do.”

“You don’t seem the same,” I point out.

“I know, it bugs me, too. But I don’t get upset about it.”

“Why not?”

“Buddhists don’t get upset. They meditate to avoid strong emotions,” he says.

“I could never be a Buddhist. There are at least 10 people I’d like to kick the shit out of this very moment.”

“Me, too.”

“What?!” I exclaim. “I thought you were a peace-loving Buddhist.”

“I know. It bugs the shit out of me.”

“Are you sure this is the same Rick I was talking to less than 2 minutes ago?”

“No,” he says.

“I don’t even know who you are anymore. Hell, I don’t even know who I am anymore. I don’t feel like me anymore,” I say.

“Do you want to go get a sandwich?” Rick asks.

“What kind of sandwich?”

“Does it really matter?”

“Not now, I guess,” I say. “I don’t know who you are. I don’t know who I am. I don’t even know if the sandwich I order will be the same sandwich it was by the time I sit down. Or if I’ll be the same person who ordered the sandwich. Maybe, by the time we sit down, I won’t like the roast-beef sandwich the person I was at the time wanted when that person ordered it. Or, to be less accurate but more specific, maybe the roast-beef sandwich will be a turkey sandwich, I’ll be Johnny Depp, and I won’t like turkey sandwiches because I get free turkey sandwiches all the time when I’m filming Pirates of the Caribbean. Meanwhile, the table will probably be a lampost, or something else completely useless for sitting at. Assuming we still have butts to sit on, or course. Or that the restaurant hasn’t become a Jiffy Lube.” 

“Okay, if it’ll make you feel better, I will buy lunch,” Rick says.

“I like Buddhism. And thinly sliced roast beef.”

“I thought you might.”

“Whatever Buddhism is. I suppose it changes all the time, too. It’s hard to define. Even the definition must change. How do you have time to keep up with it, even with all the new Ricks that keep cropping up to help you out?”

“Fuck, you’re irritating!” Rick says.

“You mean the new me that is the me you know now, or the old me that said those other things to the old you a little while ago?”

“Now you’re buying,” he says.

“I love you, Rick…”

“I love you, too, Mike.”

“…whoever you are.”

“Shut up now,” he says.

“Sounds like somebody needs some meditation time,” I say.

Sounds like somebody needs a good thrashing,” he threatens.

“I still love you, Rick, whoever you are—even if you’re the most violent Buddhist on the planet. Even if your new name is Nancy. Hi, Nancy!”

“I still love you, too,” he says.

“I know you do, Nancy. Or did. Maybe I don’t know it now since I’m a whole new person and all. Just keep saying it over and over again so all the new Mikes I’m becoming don’t forget.”

“Okay. I love you. Can we eat now?”

“Yep.”

“Good.”

Share

Thirty Days of Photographs: The Epilogue

Hi!

I’m back with more photographs. Rejects, actually. Ziva suggested that we go all Quinn Martin Productions on our Thirty Days of Photographs meme and post an epilogue featuring pictures that didn’t quite make the cut in the original series.

Okay, I thought, why not? I know Ziva’s just trying to prove that her throwaway shots are better than my best shots, but I don’t I mind a little humiliation and pain for the sake of art. So here are some of the photos that seemed less than post-worthy compared to their peers:

For Summer, I took a picture of these berry-like things on a tree near my office. It’s a nice enough photo, but I don’t know anything about berries and I was afraid that if they’re poisonous, some kid or idiot adult will eat them and then sue me. So I scratched it.

 

For Green, I took this shot of a recycling bin. I like the visual pun, and instantly thought of my friend NoName, who’s a very punny guy. But I decided the clouds were not only overexposed, but that it was just a shot of a recycling bin. I’m glad it’s getting re-used here, though. That seems very appropriate.

 

 

For Wet, I took several photographs, including one of a water bottle and another of curvy playground slide that was blatantly phallic and seemed a little pervy in hindsight. I rejected most of the photos for one reason or another, including this one. I like it a lot, especially since it’s a puddle in a parking lot. My impression of it is that it’s very impressionistic.

 

 

For Evil, I made this photograph of a spider I found in my basement. I like the bright colors juxtaposed against the dark band of black on the left, but I didn’t think the spider looked evil enough. Or large enough. So I used a close-up shot instead. The spider was huge in real life, about the size of a dinner plate or a small child. I’m surprised I survived, although I do have PTSD (Post-Traumatic Spider Disorder).

 

 

For God, I thought the lighting on the cross on this granite headstone was very dramatic, and I nearly published it. But I also took this weirdly angled, dramatically lit shot of a Jesus statue that I ran instead because it was just that much more memorable. By the way, Jesus Statue is my favorite band.

 

 

For Love, I nearly used this photo. Jospeh Emery only lived a day, but his parents were so moved by his life that they spent a small fortune on his headstone, which is one of the most unique headstones I’ve seen. I think I was afraid the picture would seem a little too sad to some people. It’s also not the best-lit or composed photo. I might go back early one morning and take another one of it just as the early morning sun hits it, although I doubt it because that would involve getting up the early morning or sleeping in the cemetery. 

 

 

For the category of Monday, I liked the word play of this sign. But it’s just a sign. Yawn.

 

 

For Different, I took this shot of a stone on a stick. I like it a lot, and have spent hours and hours staring at it, wondering what it is, and why somebody put it up. In a way, I think it may be the most memorable photo of the series for me. But I thought you might worry about my mental health if I ran it, and I was going to keep it in my private collection until Ziva pressed me into service.

 

 

For Tears, I nearly ran this photo of an onion on a chop saw. It’s kind of a visual joke. You might be interested to know that I stole the onion off a co-worker’s desk. She’s had it there for months and months, and tells me it not only protects her from getting sick, but from evil spirits. Apparently not mental illness, though. Anyway, I liked the concept and the dramatic lighting and colors, but somehow it doesn’t do the trick for me. I don’t know why. Maybe I care about onions more than I should.

 

 

For Winter, I almost ran this picture of my son’s hockey skates. But then I remembered that my son is 16 years old and that I despise him right now. Plus the strange angle of the picture makes me nauseous. That’s a double whammy, and I scrapped it.

 

 

For Music, I almost used this shot of my 13-year-old niece, Kenzie, playing her violin. I love my niece, and I like the washed-out effect I achieved with a little photo editing. But I keep perseverating on the overexposed lighting on her fingers, so it got tossed into the seconds pile.

 

For Light, I took this handheld shot of a overhead string of lights at a local pedestrian mall. It’s one of my favorite shots from the series, and I don’t think of it as a reject. I stare at it all the time, smiling broadly, because it’s shiny. I like shiny. Somebody once told me that my legs are shiny. I took that as a compliment. Shiny is good.  

Share

Thirty Days of Photographs: God

So this is it, my 30th and final photograph in this Thirty Days of Photographs meme-theme thingy I’ve been doing for the last, uhm, 30 days or so.

I’d like to thank Ziva for inviting me to join her on this quest to publicly embarrass myself. Although she’s consistently bested me in this non-competition, probably because she’s extremely talented and ought to turn pro while I’m basically a hopeless drunk, it’s been a lot of fun for me. I’d happily do it again, although not starting tomorrow because I have a long meeting to attend tomorrow and will be too tired to take pictures when I get home.

If you’ve been reading—eyeing?—along, thank you. I know you generally turn to this blog to pretend to read words, not to pretend to look at pictures, and I’m sincerely pretending to appreciate your flexibility.

To make this photo, I went out late at night and took one of my infamous hand-held night shots of an extremely large, lighted cross that a local Christian thoughtfully installed on a mountainside overlooking Denver. Then I took another shaky photo of the city below and combined the two images into a single image representing Heaven & Hell. It’s only a photo in the most technical sense, I suppose, but I like it anyway and hope you do, too.

 

 

 

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
Share